He reckoned that there were only 4 or 5 of these in a lifetime. The message here is that there is value in all predictive techniques if they are interpreted in the proper context. His work with unknown planets is remarkable. I was with him on the day when he rectified a chart by placing Midas windfall material gains on the ascendant.
It turned out that the lady client had received much real estate in a divorce settlement. He taught that all astrological techniques worked. It was up to the astrologer to reach into the bag of tricks for the tool needed to answer the client's question. He also advised that to be the best astrologer, one should study astronomy. He guided me into using declination, right ascension, helio, speed, distance, etc. These tools have been very useful in financial astrology. He once explained that heliocentric nodes were different from geocentric nodes. Both were real; they simply had different meanings.
He did not reject one for the other; he accepted both. Jayne once received a letter from Johndro explaining his work with the newly-developed electrical ascendant. Jayne tested this new point by running solar arcs to it. He concluded that the opposite point in the zodiac was more sensitive. Johndro followed this conclusion with more testing and found Jayne's finding to be accurate. Today, we know this point as the vertex.
Astrology and Horoscopes Uncloaked
Jayne felt that this point was fated and represented matters beyond our control. The discovery of the vertex was based upon his GEM dynamic field theory where G stands for gravity, E for electrical, and M for magnetism. The meridian and the midheaven correlated to gravity, the electrical ascendant antivertex-vertex axis to electricity, and the ascendant and horizon to magnetism. Charles worked on eclipses for 50 years. Much of my knowledge of this subject derives from his work. He discovered that the shadow of the eclipse embodies or holds the nature of the horoscope of that eclipse.
He also discovered that past paths can be activated by current eclipses. Writing in Dell Horoscope in the s, he accurately predicted a good deal of the course of WW2. Before his passing, he forecasted the breakup of the USSR by The rule of thumb was that a solar eclipse could have an effect beginning at least 3 months before the phenomena, lasting for 6 months or at least until the next solar eclipse.
Events occurring near eclipses are always memorable. They tend to add energy to any activity that takes place near them. These events take on more importance than the same type of event that occurs distant from an eclipse. There is a sharp difference between the week before and the week after the eclipse.
Any event or undertaking begun in the week prior to a solar eclipse differs from those actions taken after the eclipse in that they are very fated. That is, it works out unexpectedly. Events before and after the eclipse are important, but the events occurring before the eclipse take on the added attribute of being unpredictable. It is best to postpone major decisions until the week following an eclipse because one usually obtains new information or awareness that causes one to make a different decision.
The eclipse is a red flag indicating that there is hidden knowledge that can upset one's plans. Affairs begin and end abruptly around eclipses. There is a sudden focus, and then the emphasis terminates as abruptly as it began. Lunar eclipses are less powerful, but they have the same character. Eclipses can mark changes in phase in one's life. These events may be initiations or terminations. There can be sharp and dramatic changes in one's status and prestige.
- chinese horoscope rooster december 2019.
- Free Horoscope Analysis By Date Of Birth And Time.
- tomorrow is 1 february my birthday horoscope.
- pisces weekly tarot february 28 2020.
- Brief abstracts of articles!
- compatible horoscope signs for taurus.
- Top Podcasts In Religion & Spirituality.
Public standing may soar or crash due to the effects of an eclipse. He was a master of rectification, practicing for over 50 years. He once said that one could become an excellent astrologer by accurately rectifying 50 horoscopes. Charles believed that all horoscopes should be rectified. He and Eleanor Heseltine rectified batches of horoscopes and concluded that solar arc and declination arc were the most accurate techniques for doing so.
His rejection of psychological astrology was a reflection of his own preference for the more mental side of the field. During a period when astrology was becoming more humanistic and psychological, Charles provided a balance in that he constantly taught the need for accuracy and technical expertise. Jayne's book on progressions and directions is still a landmark work. His work on locality astrology, long-term cycles, and pre-natal charts was ground breaking. Having studied history, he confirmed in astrological terms many of the cycles discovered by academics like Toynbee.
This was the tool that was employed to predict the fall of the Soviet empire. Charles Jayne is the father of modern technical astrology based upon his 57 years of work.
The fact that he did his work in a period that had no PCs and no software makes his accomplishments all the more remarkable. Jayne's books are available from the American Federation of Astrologers , S. Rural Rd. Note that the dates for Libra and Scorpio do not overlap at all; anyone who thinks they are one of those is definitely something else.
- What Happens When Your Town Dries Up??
- Single Post | astrologer.
- Why Are Millennials So Into Astrology? - The Atlantic.
- aries weekly horoscope from 9 january 2020;
- week by week.
When defending this discrepancy, astrologers claim that signs and constellations are two different things. Indeed, the modern tropical zodiac was created by taking the equinoxes and solstices and corresponding them to the four "cardinal" signs, and finding the rest of the signs by dividing the four seasons into three signs for a grand total of The modern Western zodiac has little to do with the constellations its 12 signs are named after, and more to do with the sun's cycle between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn.
That being said, Vedic Astrology is sidereal, meaning that is based on where the constellations are now rather than where they were in antiquity the way Western, or tropical astrology is. They still, however, do not use Ophiuchus. Because again, this stuff is arbitrary. The scientific view, in the most candid form, is that astrology is a load of ancient nonsense that is, these days, perpetrated by ignorant fools or those wishing to exploit others.
Some of the authors
It is, for lack of a better word, crap. In the interest of being factual, honest, and accurate rather than merely rhetorical, the scientific point of view will be spread out in more detail below, but it will come to the same conclusion: astrology is crap. Fundamentally, astrology is the assertion that stuff happening in space affects us here — astrologers may suggest that it allows for predictions, but such predictions would not be possible if a connection did not somehow exist. This section explores whether such forces could exist.
Astrologers may claim straw man here, but if there was a theoretically possible way to determine future events or dictate personality types there would be some connection whether they like it or not. There is no known mechanism whereby a person could be significantly influenced by distant celestial bodies.
A psychological explanation - where pretty shapes in the sky sub-consciously alter people's moods, perceptions or desires, like an accidental form of advertising or brainwashing — is unlikely as stars and celestial objects don't tend to be visible during the day and, with the exception of very dramatic events such as eclipses , all look the same to the untrained eye.
In addition, viewing the stars in order to be psychologically influenced by them isn't a prerequisite for astrology, as a predictive mechanism, working. More "physical" explanations are equally unlikely — this requires briefly looking into the physics that could possibly be behind it. The fundamental natural forces in nature are the strong and weak nuclear forces, the electromagnetic force , and the gravitational force. The strong and weak forces are nuclear forces, and are not applicable to interactions between people and objects such as planets or stars — their strengths tail off so dramatically that they barely have any effect outside the nucleus of an atom , let alone at the macroscopic scale.
Similarly, the electrostatic force — while acting at greater distances than nuclear forces — becomes completely negligible at modest distance, and does not act in any way over astronomical distance. This leaves us with the one remaining "long distance" force; gravity.
However, despite working over far vaster distances than other forces, it is still practically impossible for planets to influence actions on Earth. Gravity follows the inverse square law , that is, that gravitational strength is proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance. As distance increases, gravitational pull decreases very dramatically; something that moves to twice as far away exerts a quarter of the gravitational pull, something three times further away exerts a ninth of the gravitational pull.
Newton's law of gravitation can be used to show that, at its closest approach to Earth, the planet Mars exerts approximately the same gravitational force on a person as a ton fully-loaded big rig placed 15 yards from that same person. The star Alpha Centauri A has a mass of 1.
The moon and sun, being closer, exert more force on the earth and result in the changing of tides although this system is a little more complex than "the moon pulls water towards it". Astrology is often not limited to just these two objects with the highest degree of gravitational interference and even so, these should — like with water in the tides — affect everyone equally. The great distances of these objects produce a further problem. Their pull on us is very close to their pull on the Earth as a whole.
Jayne and Johndro
This differential pull is the tidal force, and it goes as the inverse cube of the distance. Not surprisingly, tidal forces are even smaller than overall gravitational ones. The planet Mars produces as much tidal effect on us as a small sand grain diameter: 0. Astrological forces, furthermore, are allegedly powerful enough that they cannot be escaped by shielding or descent underground.
It is possible to evade electromagnetic radiation of all kinds. Although it is possible to protect oneself from electromagnetic radiation radio waves, infrared and ultraviolet radiation, visible light, X-rays and ionizing radiation by shielding or going underground, astrological 'forces' supposedly can pass through lead-lined shielding or several meters of rock or hundreds of meters of water — the latter not creating its own astrological effects. Going into a mine, tunnel, cave, or submarine in an effort to avoid 'unfavorable' influences in one's horoscope gives one no protection not that mines, tunnels, caves, and submarines are without their own dangers.
Whatever the mysterious force may be that astrologists claim causes the effects of the positions and movements of celestial bodies on human physiology , it is not backed up by any current knowledge or research and certainly isn't real. If there is a force, it can't be detected, and woo pushers tend to like that sort of thing — but this raises an important question; if it can't be detected in any way, shape or form , then how can it actually affect anything?
However, we can still be open to so-called " supernatural " explanations and only look at the efficacy of astrology, treating it as a purely empirical question. One force that almost certainly has an effect on people is the month they were born — though this has nothing to do with sun or star signs. Not at all; it's simply a case of when the Australian school year begins.
IUF - International Uranian Fellowship - Start
Those born in January are nearly 12 months older than peers born in the following December, but are placed in the same school year — and the older ones are at a significant advantage at sports. When replicated in other countries with different distributions for the school year, the months where this trend appears shift accordingly. In this case, the relative age effect is shown to have a cultural and location dependence, which would not be consistent with astrological predictions based on stars. The complexities involved in seasonal cycles to weather patterns, sunspots and food production, mean that time and date almost certainly correlate with a multitude of factors that can appear as very real trends.
The development of astrology may have been tapping into these observations, but then overextended the effect to things that were just plain wrong. What is certain, however, is that attributing these simple correlations to quasi-magical forces and star signs is wrong. Assuming astrology does work, then we should be able to get a reliable definition of what "astrology works" means. In this case, it should provide a reliable source of accurate predictions and statements, and these should be better than randomly guessing once naturalistic explanations for any successes or in less politically correct terms, cheating has been controlled for.
Casebooks in Early Modern England:
This is an important aspect of testing astrology, as practitioners are highly likely to worm out of such conditions. One of the great successes of woo movements is convincing people that it's legitimate to ignore such misses, and to think that a technique works except for the times that it doesn't. As a very good "technique works except for the times that it doesn't" is perfectly naturalistic guesswork, then holding up astrology to this standard is a perfectly valid way — indeed, it is the valid way — of testing its veracity.
As people happily read what they like into statements as vague as horoscopes, this never ends in astrology's favour. Six expert astrologers independently attempted to match 23 astrological birth charts to the corresponding case files of 4 male and 19 female volunteers. Case files contained information on the volunteers' life histories, full-face and profile photographs, and test profiles from the Strong-Campbell Vocational Interest Blank and the Cattell P.
Personality Inventory. Astrologers did no better than chance or than a nonastrologer control subject at matching the birth charts to the personal data; this result was independent of astrologers' confidence ratings for their predicted matches. Astrologers also failed to agree with one another's predictions. While astrologers and believers may accuse science of being quite dogmatic over the "astrology is bullshit" line, rest assured it has been tested.
If astrology was anywhere near as potent a tool as believers and astrologers suggest, results from even small-scale tests should end positively. One of the more famous and better controlled studies is the one performed by Shawn Carlson and published in Nature in Astrologers were given the task of matching birth charts to personality types — a fairly simple task for a discipline that claims that your birth chart is "as unique as you are" and "reveals your potential in this lifetime and also where you are in that journey".
Indeed, what would those phrases even mean if such a task couldn't be performed by an expert astrologer. However, astrologers themselves weren't best pleased with such a negative result, citing various issues with the apparently simple test. An article in the Astrology News Service is a curious example of kettle logic as it seems to simultaneously assert that the test was unfair and skewed, and so unlikely to show any effect, and that reanalysis of the data suggests the astrologers were correct .
At the beginning of , Galileo Galilei looked at Jupiter with his telescope. The planet was resolved as a disk, and it had three faint stars nearby. A day or so later, he looked again, and the stars had moved. He continued to observe the planet, and he noticed that these three stars, and a fourth one also, were moving back and forth relative to Jupiter.
He concluded that here were four objects that orbit Jupiter. The next year, a certain Francesco Sizzi of Florence made an astrological sort of argument that those moons cannot possibly exist. Auctore Francisco Sitio Florentino in Latin ; lpetrich's translation of its title: "Understanding of astronomy, optics, and physics, about a rumor in Sidereus Nuncius about the four planets seen by the very celebrated mathematician Galileo Galilei with his telescope, shown to be unfounded.
In the microcosm, the human head has seven openings: two nostrils, two eyes, two ears, and one mouth. He also noted that there are seven days in the week, seven metals, etc. Given all these corresponding sets of seven, there was clearly no place for the extra planets that Galileo had claimed to have discovered. So they do not exist. Conversely one has to wonder why astrologers did not discover the existence of Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto -among other Solar System bodies not known to the developers of astrology- based on how their predictions were messed by the influences of several unknown bodies, before astronomers discovered them [note 2].
Except on a few cases as Orion , Ursa Major , or Scorpius , where some of the brightest stars that form a constellation are physically associated and at relatively similar distances to us [note 3]. Typically, said stars are at very different separations from Earth and appear to form a more or less recognizable pattern just from our vantage point. In addition to this, as stars -the Sun included- orbit through the Milky Way said patterns change in a scale of many thousands of years becoming distinct with time [note 4].
In addition to that, not only the twelve zodiacal constellations are the ones that are visited by the Sun, the Moon, and the planets. Ophiuchus is the best example, having been left out by the Babylonians as they had a twelve-month lunar calendar, but if one includes others the western Zodiac would have up to twenty-five ones [note 5]. Predictions made by astrologers vary wildly from the vague to the specific — though most often they are extremely vague or at least vaguely in line with what most people think based on looking at the world around them, rather than the sky above.
There will be more flooding than ever before, unexpected hurricanes, tornadoes, typhoons and storms and towns and cities will disappear in the twinkling of an eye"  — which most climatologists suggest may well occur due to global warming. Indeed, other items mentioned in that prediction include "more products using nanotechnology ", as if the increased use of a scientific buzzword was somehow only predictable through reading the stars and "expect to see huge growth in digital information clouds.
Generally, the more vague a prediction, the higher the chance it has of coming true. More accurately, the higher the chance that it can be interpreted as having been true after the fact, or retroactively reinterpreted as having not occurred because of some good graces. This can be seen most easily in the form of astrology that most people are familiar with; the horoscope.
A horoscope is a prediction or advice based only on someone's date of birth, or more commonly in newspapers and magazines, for instance their zodiac sign , of which there are Given that there are more than 6 billion people on Earth, at least one horoscope in every publication applies to more than million people from the pigeonhole principle. It is a clear fact that half a billion people do not have the same experiences each day, so the power of these predictions cannot be as widely and universally applied as is claimed. Another trick used by astrologers is to give information that almost sounds like a contradiction.
For example "You are an independent thinker who values the insight of others", or "You stay true to your plans but are very adaptable". If you are a Capricorn an introverted sign but you have a Leo moon very extroverted , you can relate to one or the other depending on whether you feel more extroverted or introverted.